바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of School Psychology

Double mediation effects of cognitive emotion regulation strategy and conflict resolution strategy on the association between rejection sensitivity and dating relationship satisfaction

Abstract

This study examined how the rejection sensitivity model might be applied to the link between rejection sensitivity and dating relationship satisfaction by means of investigating the mediating effect of cognitive emotion regulation strategy and conflict resolution strategy. A total of 668 college students in Seoul (232 males, 436 females, mean age of 21.59 years [SD=2.08]) participated in this study. The results illustrated that the adaptive emotion regulation strategy, among cognitive emotion regulation strategies, and the integration and compromise strategies, among conflict resolution strategies, had the double mediation effect on the association between rejection sensitivity and dating relationship satisfaction. In other words, a direct negative correlation between rejection sensitivity and dating relationship satisfation resulted in high rejection sensitivity, which was expected to generate low satisfaction in dating relationships. However, it was confirmed that the use of these two strategies-the cognitive emotion regulation and the conflict resolution strategy-could bring positive effects in terms of the dating relationship satisfaction; the former helped couples to see situations more broadly and increase positive perceptions, while the latter solve their problems each other. Based on these findings, we discuss their implications for counseling practice and therapeutic interventions

keywords
rejection sensitivity, dating relationship satisfaction, cognitive emotion regulation, conflict resolution strategy, collage students
Submission Date
2020-06-23
Revised Date
2020-07-28
Accepted Date
2020-07-28

Reference

1.

김소희 (2004). 스트레스 사건, 인지적 정서조절전략과 심리적 안녕감 간의 관계. 가톨릭대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

2.

김은지 (2016). 부모애착이 이성관계 만족도에 미치는 영향, 거부민감성의 매개효과. 가톨릭대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

3.

김지현 (2006). 조망수용, 관계귀인, 갈등대처행동 및 이성교제 만족도 간의 관계. 가톨릭대학교 상담심리대학원 석사학위논문.

4.

박나현 (2016). 미혼 성인남녀의 성인애착과 이성관계 만족도의 관계: 인지 정서조절전략과 사회지지 추구의 매개효과. 영남대학교대학원 석사학위논문.

5.

박소영, “대학생 고민 1순위는 취업?... ‘주변관계’를 더 걱정했다”, 한국일보, 1021, 2017.

6.

박영은 (2017). 거부민감성과 이성관계 만족의관계에서 자기자비와 인지적 정서조절전략의 매개효과. 가톨릭대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

7.

박희경 (2011). 성인애착과 갈등해결전략의 관계: 거부민감성의 매개효과. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

8.

우종필 (2012). 우종필 교수의 구조방정식 모델개념과 이해. 서울: 한나래아카데미.

9.

이경성, 한덕웅 (2003). 결혼적응검사의 개발. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8, 679-705.

10.

이경성, 한덕웅 (2005). 친밀한 이성관계에서이상과 현재의 차이가 관계만족에 미치는영향. 한국심리학회지 사회 및 성격, 19(1), 163-184.

11.

이민선, 노안영 (2018). 대학생의 거부민감성과연애관계 만족도와의 관계에서 인지적 정서조절과 자기침묵의 이중매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 30(4), 1175-1192.

12.

이복동 (2000). 성인 애착과 이성관계 만족-거부민감성과 귀인 양식의 매개효과를 중심으로. 고려대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

13.

이설아, 박기환 (2013). 유기 도식과 이성관계만족도의 관계에서 인지적 정서 조절 전략의 매개효과. 인지행동치료, 13(1), 1-17.

14.

조재숙 (2017). 연애경험에서 거부민감성이 이성관계 만족에 미치는 영향: 갈등대처 행동을매개로. 순천향대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

15.

홍종배 (2006). 글로벌시대의 갈등 관리: 한국인과 미국인의 문화 내 및 문화 간 갈등관리 전략의 비교. 스피치와 커뮤니케이션, 6, 168-201.

16.

현소진 (2019). 대학생의 이성관계만족도, 아동기 정서적 학대경험, 성인애착불안 및 거부민감성의 구조적 관계 분석. 한양대학교대학원 석사학위논문.

17.

황여주 (2013). 미혼 남녀의 정서조절과 이성관계 만족도 관계에서 갈등대처방략의 매개효과와 갈등빈도의 조절효과. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

18.

Ayduk O., Mendoza-Denton R., Mischel W., Downey G., Peake P. K., Rodriguez M.. (2000). Regulating the interpersonal self:strategic self-regulation for coping with rejection sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 776-792. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.776

19.

Ayduk, O., May, D., Downey. G., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Tactical difference in coping with rejection sensitivity; The role of prevention pride. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(4), 435-448.

20.

Ayduk, O., Zayas, V., Downey, G., Cole, A. B., Shoda, Y., & Mischel, W. (2008). Rejection sensitivity and executive control: Joint predictors of borderline personality features. Jornal of Research in Personality, 42, 151-168.

21.

Ayduk, Ozlem & Mischel, Walter & Downey, Geraldine. (2002). Attentional Mechanisms Linking Rejection to Hostile Reactivity: The Role of “Hot” Versus “Cool” Focus. Psychological science. 13. 443-8. 10.1111/1467-9280.00478.

22.

Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The Effects of Item Parceling on Goodness-of-Fit and Parameter Estimate Bias in Structural Equation Modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 78-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0901_5

23.

Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51. 1173-1182. 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.

24.

Birditt, K. S., Brown, E., Orbuch, T. L. and McIlvane, J. M. (2010) Marital Conflict Behaviors and Implications for Divorce over 16 Years. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 72, 1188-1204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00758.x

25.

Braithwaite, S. R., Delevi, R., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). Romantic relationships and the physical and mental health of college students. Personal Relationships, 17(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01248.x

26.

Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 225-236.

27.

De Dreu, C. K. W., Evers, A., Beersma, B., Kluwer, E. S. and Nauta, A. (2001), A theory‐based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace. J. Organiz. Behav., 22: 645-668. doi:10.1002/job.107

28.

Dodge & Somberg (1987). Hostile attributional biases among aggressive boys are exacerbated under conditions of threats to the self. Child Development, 58, 213-224.

29.

Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996). Implications of Rejection Sensitivity for Intimate Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1327-1343.

30.

Downey, G., Freitas, A. L., Michaelis, B., & Khouri, H. (1998). The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy in Close Relationships: Rejection Sensitivity and Rejection by Romantic Partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 545-560.

31.

Downey, G., Mougios, V., Ayduk, O., London, B. E., & Shoda, Y. (2004). Rejection sensitivity and the defensive motivational system: Insights from the startle response to rejection cues. Psychological Science, 15, 668-673.

32.

Erikson, E. (1971). Erikson’s pscychological theory. New York: Doubledy Anchor.

33.

Furman, W., & Shaffer, L. (2003). The role of romantic relationships in adolescent development. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 3-22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

34.

Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V. (2007). The cognitive emotion regulation questionnarie: Psychometric features and prospective relationships with depression and anxiety in adults. European Journal of psychological Assessment, 23(3), 141-149.

35.

Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative Life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1311-1327.

36.

Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion Regulation: Current Status and Future Prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1-26.

37.

Hong, J. (2005). Conflict management in an age of globalization: a comparison of intacultural and intercultural conflict management strategies between Koreans and Americans. Global Media Journal, 4(6), 169-202.

38.

Impett, E. A., Gables, S. L., & Peplau, L. A. (2005). Giving up and giving in: The costs and benefits of daily sacrifice in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 327-344.

39.

Khaleque, A., Uddin, M., Hossain, K., Siddique, N., & Shirin, A. (2019). Perceived Parental Acceptance-Rejection in Childhood Predict Psychological Adjustment and Rejection Sensitivity in Adulthood. Psychological Studies. 64. 10.1007/s12646-019-00508-z.

40.

Karney, B. R, & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3-34.

41.

Kelly, C., Huston, T. L., & Cate, R. M. (1985). Premarital relationship correlates of the erosion of satisfaction in marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 167-178.

42.

Karoly, P. (1993). Mechanism of self-regulation: A systems view. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 44, 23-52. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.000323

43.

Lantagne, A., Furman, W., & Novak, J. (2017). “Stay or leave”: Predictors of relationship dissolution in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 5(4), 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696817699750

44.

Leggett, D. G., Roberts-Pittman, B., Byczek, S., & Morse, D. T. (2012). Cooperation, conflict, and marital satisfaction: Bridging theory, research, and practice. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 68(2), 182-199.

45.

Levy, S. R., Ayduk, O., & Downey, G. (2001). The role of rejection sensitivity in people's relationships with significant others and valued social groups. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection (p. 251-289). Oxford University Press.

46.

McNulty, J. K., & Russell, V. M. (2010). When “negative” behaviors are positive: A contextual analysis of the long-term effects of problem-solving behaviors on changes in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 587-604. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017479

47.

Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3

48.

Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244, 933-938.

49.

Preti, E., Casini, E., Richetin, J., De Panfilis, C., & Fontana, A. (2018). Cognitive and Emotional Components of Rejection Sensitivity: Independent Contributions to Adolescent Selfand Interpersonal Functioning. Assessment. 10.1177/1073191118817866.

50.

Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368-376. https://doi.org/10.2307/255985

51.

Rahim, A. M. (2002). Toward a Theory of Managing Organizational Conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management. 13(3), 206-23.

52.

Rahim, A., & Bonoma, T. V. (1979). Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychological Reports, 44(3, Pt 2), 1323-1344. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1979.44.3c.1323

53.

Rahim, M. A., & Magner, N. R. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the styles of handling interpersonal conflict: First-order factor model and its invariance across groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 122-132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.122

54.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

55.

Scheeren, P., de Andrade Vieira, R. V., Goulart, V. R., & Wagner, A. (2014). Marital quality and attachment: The mediator role of conflict resolution styles. Paidéia, 24(58), 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272458201405

56.

Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies:New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422

57.

Wheeler, L. A., Updegraff, K., & Thayer, S. M. (2010). Conflict resolution in mexican-origin couples: Culture, gender, and marital quality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(4), 991-1005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00744.x

58.

Vescio, T. K., Gervais, S. J., Snyder, M., & Hoover, A. (2005). Power and the Creation of Patronizing Environments: The Stereotype-Based Behaviors of the Powerful and Their Effects on Female Performance in Masculine Domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 658-672. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.658

59.

Vicario, M., Hudgins-Mitchell, C., & Corbisello, G. (2012). The Foster Parent Suurvival Guide. Cncinnati, OH: Finding Hope Counseling.

60.

Wilmot, W. W., & Hocker, J. L. (2001). Interpersonal Conflict(6th ed). New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.

Korean Journal of School Psychology