바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of School Psychology

Classifying the Latent Group of Elementary School Students Based on Social Achievement Goals Types and the Exploration of Peer Status and Aggression

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the latent profiles of social achievement goals and to investigate the differences in peer status (perceived popularity, social preference) and aggression (overt, relational, cyber) among those profile groups. Social achievement goals and cyber aggression data was acquired through self-reporting, and perceived popularity, social preference, and overt and relational aggression were assessed through peer nomination. Applying the latent profile analysis(LPA) to 1,239 elementary school students, three distinct groups of social achievement goals were identified: a development-oriented achievement goal group, an average social goal group, and a overall-high social achievement goal group. Using logistic regression analysis, the relationships between the latent group, peer status, and aggression were examined. The result indicated that the higher the social preference, the lower the probability of belonging to the ‘overall-high social achievement goal group’. And the higher the cyber aggression, the lower the probability of belonging to the ‘development-oriented achievement goal group’. In addition, the higher the relational aggression of the second time, the higher the probability of belonging to the ‘overall-high social achievement goal group’ as compared to the ‘average social goal group’.

keywords
social achievement goal, peer status, aggression, cyber aggression, latent profile analysis
Submission Date
2020-07-20
Revised Date
2020-08-14
Accepted Date
2020-08-17

Reference

1.

권재기 (2011). 집단따돌림 피해경험의 발달양상과 내면화-외현화 문제행동의 변화: 잠재계층 성장 분석(LCGA)․다집단 성장혼합모형(GMM)을 이용한 종단연구. 한국아동복지학, 34, 96-127.

2.

김진구 (2017). 초등학생의 또래생태에 대한 교사-학생 지지와 갈등의 조절효과: 공격성의또래영향과 사회화를 중심으로. 건국대학교대학원 박사학위논문.

3.

문경숙, 박종효, 안해정, 최지영, 홍경화, 김진구, 최은영 (2018). 초등학생의 공격성 유형에 따른 잠재집단 분류 및 심리사회적특성 탐색. 한국교육, 45(4), 35-59.

4.

박종효, 문경숙, 안해정, 최지영, 홍경화, 김진구, 최은영 (2017). 사회연결망분석에 기초한 웹 기반 클래스넷(ClassNet) 프로그램개발 연구. 교육과학연구, 48(3), 107-137.

5.

박종효․최은영 (2017). 성장혼합모형을 활용한 청소년의 사이버 괴롭힘 피해경험의발달 유형화와 전통적 괴롭힘과의 관련성탐색. 열린교육연구, 25(4), 217-242.

6.

안혜진 (2012). 성취목표에 대한 재개념화 모형검증. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 박사학위청구논문.

7.

안혜진, 송인섭 (2012). 사회적 성취목표 척도의 타당화. 교육심리연구, 26(4), 853-875.

8.

양하련, 이은주 (2014). 청소년의 사회적 성취목표와 또래관계 질의 관계: 친사회성과공격성의 매개효과. 중등교육연구, 62(1), 235-260.

9.

여태철, 김명섭 (2019). 또래 내 인기와 사회적성취목표가 공격성에 미치는 영향: 성별차이를 중심으로. 교육문화연구, 25(1), 577-595.

10.

염혜선 (2018). 중학생의 4요인 사회적 성취목표 잠재프로파일 분류 및 사회적 적응 탐색. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 18(24), 179-198.

11.

염혜선, 이은주 (2015). 사회적 및 학업적 맥락에서 유능감과 성취목표지향성, 학업성취, 또래관계 질의 구조적 관계. 교육심리연구, 29(2), 185-207.

12.

염혜선, 이은주 (2016). 학업적, 사회적 성취목표지향성의 잠재프로파일에 따른 학업적, 사회적 적응의 차이. 교육심리연구, 30(1), 255-276.

13.

염혜선, 이은주 (2018). 중학생의 또래관계 변화신념, 사회적 성취목표, 갈등해결전략, 또래관계 질 및 공격성의 관계. 교육심리연구, 32(2), 295-319.

14.

최지영, 문경숙, 안해정, 홍경화, 김진구, 최은영, 박종효 (2018). 자기보고와 또래지명을활용한 공격성 수준별 유형의 학교적응과심리적 특성 탐색. The SNU Journal of Education Research, 27(3), 29-51.

15.

한승수, 이은주 (2020). 사회적 목표의 잠재프로파일과 성취정서, 학업노력, 학업성취도의 구조적 관계. 한국청소년연구, 31(1), 235-264.

16.

Andreou, E. (2006). Social preference, perceived popularity and social intelligence: Relations to overt and relational aggression. School Psychology International, 27(3), 339-351.

17.

Ang, R. P., & Goh, D. H. (2010). Cyberbullying among adolescents: The role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 41, 387-397.

18.

van den Berg, Y. H. M., Burk, W. J., &Cillessen, A. H. N. (2015). Identifying subtypes of peer status by combining popularity and preference: A cohort-sequential approach. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(8), 1108-1137.

19.

Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722.

20.

Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot &C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52-72). New York, NY:Guilford.

21.

Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle: A reissue. New York: Norton

22.

Garandeau, C. F., Ahn, H. J., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). The social status of aggressive students across contexts: The role of classroom status hierarchy, academic achievement, and grade. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1699-1710.

23.

Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33(1), 1-21.

24.

Hawley, P. H. (2013). Social dominance in childhood and adolescence: Why social competence and aggression may go hand in hand. In P. H. Hawley, T. D. Little, & P. C. Rodkin (Eds.), Aggression and adaptation:The bright side to bad behavior. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

25.

Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 123-147.

26.

Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W.(2014). Bullying:Beyond the school yard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Cor-win Press.

27.

Huesmann, L. R., Eron, L. D., Guerra, N. G., &Crawshaw, V. B. (1994). Measuring children's aggression with teachers' predictions of peer nominations. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 329-336.

28.

Jung, T., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302-317.

29.

Kowalski, R., Giummetti, G., Schroeder, A., &Lattanner, M. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 1-61.

30.

Lee, H. Y., & Yeager, D. S. (2020). Adolescents with an entity theory of personality are more vigilant to social status and use relational aggression to maintain social status. Social Development, 29(1), 273-289.

31.

Lee, J. (2018). Social Achievement Goals and Social Adjustment in Adolescence: A Multiple ‐Goal. Perspective. Japanese Psychological Research, 60(3), 121-133.

32.

Logis, H. A., Rodkin, P. C., Gest, S. D., & Ahn, H. J. (2013). Popularity as an organizing factor of preadolescent friendship networks:Beyond prosocial and aggressive behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 413-423.

33.

Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., &Morin, A. J. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions:Synergy of person-and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(2), 191-225.

34.

Mouratidis, A. A., & Sideridis, G. D. (2009). On social achievement goals: Their relations with peer acceptance, classroom belongingness, and perceptions of loneliness. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77(3), 285-308.

35.

Murray-Close, D., & Ostrov, J. M. (2009). A longitudinal study of forms and functions of aggressive behavior in early childhood. Child Development, 80(3), 828-842.

36.

Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2000). Integrating person‐centered and variablecentered analyses:Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(6), 882-891.

37.

Ojanen, T., Grönroos, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2005). An interpersonal circumplex model of children’s social goals: Links with peer-reported behavior and sociometric status. Developmental Psychology, 41, 699-710.

38.

Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students:The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36(2), 81-94.

39.

Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14-24.

40.

Rodkin, P. C., Ryan, A. M., Jamison, R., &Wilson, T. (2013). Social goals, social behavior, and social status in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1139-1150.

41.

Ryan, A. M., & Hopkins, N. B. (2003). Achievement goals in the social domain. University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign.

42.

Ryan, A. M., & Shim, S. S. (2006). Social achievement goals: The nature and consequences of different orientations toward social competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1246-1263.

43.

Ryan, A. M., & Shim, S. S. (2008). An exploration of young adolescents' social achievement goals and social adjustment in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 672-687.

44.

Ryan, A. M., & Shin, H. (2018). Peers, academics, and teachers. In W. M. Bukowski, B.Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.). Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups(pp. 637-656). (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

45.

Ryan, A. M., Hicks, L., & Midgley, C. (1997). Social goals, and avoiding seeking help in the classroom. Journal of Early Adolescence, 17, 152-171.

46.

Ryan, A. M., Jamison, R. S., Shin, H., &Thompson, G. N. (2012). Social achievement goals and adjustment at school during early adolescence. In A. M. Ryan, & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 165-186). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

47.

Shim, S. S., & Ryan, A. M. (2012). What do students want socially when they arrive at college? Implications of social achievement goals for social behaviors and adjustment during the first semester of college. Motivation and Emotion, 36(4), 504-515.

48.

Sijtsema, J. J., Ojanen, T., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Hawley, P. H., & Little, T. D. (2010). Forms and functions of aggression in adolescent friendship selection and influence: A longitudinal social network analysis. Social Development, 19(3), 515-534.

49.

Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 202-209.

50.

Willard, N. (2006). Cyberbullying and Cyberthreat:Responding to the Challenge of Online Social Aggression, Threats, and Distress. Eugene, OR:Center for the Safe and Responsible Internet Use.

51.

Wright, M. F. (2014). Longitudinal investigation of the associations between adolescents’ popularity and cyber social behaviors. Journal of School Violence, 13(3), 291-314.

Korean Journal of School Psychology