바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of School Psychology

The Relationships among the Strategies of Motivation Regulation, the Motivation Types of Self-Determination, and Academic Achievement of the Middle School Students

Abstract

This study was conducted to explore how middle school students regulate motivation, and to explore the relationships between the strategies of motivation regulation and the motivation types of self-determination, and to explore the differences in the strategies of motivation regulation between high school achievement group and low school achievement group according to the motivation types of self-determination. Five hundred seventy four middle school students participated in this study. The results of this study showed: (a) that the regulation of environment is most frequently used by middle school students, followed by the performance self-talk, the task value, and the regulation of interests; (b) that the regulation of motivation has significantly positive correlations with introjective motivation, identified motivation, and intrinsic motivation, and the strategies of motivation regulation have explained intrinsic motivation and identified motivation among the motivation types of self-determination; (c) that the regulation of motivation has positive correlation with school achievement, and the higher school achievement the students have, the higher self-efficacy scores they have, regardless of the types of self-determination. The results of this study were discussed and the further studies based on the limitations of this study were suggested.

keywords
동기조절전략, 자기결정동기 유형, 학업성취, regulation of motivation, motivation types of self-determination, school achievement, middle school students

Reference

1.

김아영 (2002). 자기결정성 이론에 따른 학습동기 유형 분류체계의 타당성. 교육심리연구, 16(4), 169-187.

2.

김아영, 오순애 (2001). 자기결정성 정도에 따른 동기유형의 분류. 교육심리연구, 15(4), 97-119.

3.

김은영 (2006). 대학생 동기조절 훈련 프로그램의 개발 및 효과. 서울여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

4.

김은영 (2007). 초·중·고등학생의 자기결정동기와 자기조절학습간의 관계 연구. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

5.

박미혜 (2009). 중학생의 다중지능 및 교과흥미도와 학업성취도와의 관계. 원광대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.

6.

박병기, 정기수, 김선미, 이종욱 (2005). 자기조절학습의 복합적 측정도구 개발과 타당화: 동기조절 척도의 통합을 중심으로. 교육심리연구, 19(2), 455-476.

7.

박승호 (1995). 초인지, 초동기, 의지통제와 자기조절학습과의 관계. 교육심리연구, 9(2), 57-90.

8.

송인섭, 박성윤 (2000). 목표지향성, 자기조절학습, 학업성취와의 관계연구. 교육심리연구, 14(2), 29-64.

9.

양명희 (2000). 자기조절학습의 모형탐색과 타당화 연구. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

10.

여은실 (2009). 자기결정이론의 무동기개념에 대한 타당성 탐색: 동기에 관여하는 목표와 과제가치를 중심으로. 한국교원대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

11.

오순애 (2001). 외재적 동기와 내재적 동기 사이에 존재하는 새로운 동기 유형. 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.

12.

오주연 (2006). 보상계획 참여 여부에 따른 초등학생의 목표지향성별 학업 성취도 및 흥미에 미치는 영향. 고려대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.

13.

유순화 (2007). 초등학교에서 중학교로의 전환에 관한 학생들의 기대와 지각. 초등교육연구, 20(1), 355-375.

14.

이나영 (2008). 청소년의 자기결정성 동기 유형에 따른 학업성취와 자아탄력성의 관계. 연세대학교 생활환경대학원 석사학위논문.

15.

이남희 (2006). 중학생의 자기결정성, 자기효능감 및 자기조절학습능력의 관계. 전북대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.

16.

이미봉 (2003). 자기결정동기와 자기조절학습이 학업성취에 미치는 영향. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

17.

이민희 (2006). 학습장면에서 자기결정론의 동기화 경로 모형 검증. 중앙대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

18.

이석영 (2009). 학업적 자기효능감, 자기결정성 동기, 학업성취간의 관계 연구. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

19.

이지혜 (2009). 자기결정성 학습동기, 메타인지, 자기주도적 학습능력 및 학습몰입과 학업성취 간의 구조적 관계 분석. 충북대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

20.

정미경 (1999). 자기조절학습과 학업성취의 관계에 관한 구조모형 검증. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

21.

정미경 (2003). 중학생의 자기조절학습 검사개발. 교육학연구, 41(4), 157-182.

22.

한순미 (2004). 학습동기 변수들과 인지전략 및 학업성취 간의 관계. 교육심리연구, 18(1), 329-350.

23.

한국교육과정평가원 (2005). 우리나라 중·고등학생의 학업 성취도 국제 수준. 한국교육과정평가원.

24.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

25.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.

26.

Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(5), 1017-1028.

27.

Baker. S. R. (2004). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational orientations: Their role in university adjustment, stress, well-being, and subsequent academic performance. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 23(3), 189-202.

28.

Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D(1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 363-423.

29.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

30.

Harackiewicz, J. (1979). The effects of reward contingency and performance feedback on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1352-1363.

31.

Hayamizu, T. (1997). Between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Examination of reasons for academic study based on the theory of internalization. Japanese Psychological Research, 39(2), 98-108.

32.

Hidi, S. (2000). An interest researcher's perspective: The effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. NY: Academic Press.

33.

Karniol, R., & Ross, M. (1977). The effect of performance relevant and performance irrelevant rewards on children's intrinsic motivation. Child development, 48(2), 482-487.

34.

Legault, L., Green-Demers, I., & Pelletier, L. (2006). Why Do High School Stydents Lack Motivation in the Classroom? Toward an Understanding of Academic motivation and the Role of Social Support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 567-582.

35.

Lepper, M. R., Henderlong, J., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184-196.

36.

Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578.

37.

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.

38.

Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. Maehr, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulator processes (Vol. 7). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

39.

Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application. NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

40.

Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the interpersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(3), 450-461.

41.

Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749-761.

42.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1996). When paradigms clash: Comments on Cameron and Pierce's claim that rewards do not undermine intrinsic motivation. Review of Educational Research, 66(1), 33-38.

43.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.

44.

Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression development, and death. San Francisco: Freeman.

45.

Schunk, D. H. (1983). Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 19(1), 48-58.

46.

Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A, R. (1985). Peer models: Influence on children's self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 313-322.

47.

Simmons, R., & Blyth, D. (1987). Moving into adolescence: The impact of pubertal change and school context. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

48.

Vallerand, R. J., Pellerier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brie're, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallie'res, E. F. (1993). On the assessment of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education: Evidence on the concurrent and construct validity of the Acacemic Motivation Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(1), 159-172.

49.

Vellerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1161-1176.

50.

Vallerand, R. J. & Bisonnette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior ; A perspective study. Journal of Personality, 60(3), 599-620.

51.

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310.

52.

Wolters, C. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students' regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 224-235.

53.

Wolters, C. (1999). The relation between high school students' motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 3(3), 281-299.

54.

Wolters, C. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of Self-regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189-205.

55.

Wolters, C., & Rosenthal, H. (2000). The relation between students' motivational beliefs and their use of motivational regulation strategies. International Journal of Educational Research, 33(2), 801-820.

56.

Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663-676.

Korean Journal of School Psychology